hugo vs jekyll

If the theme doesn't already have a Gemfile, it's fairly easy to add. any code highligted with a backtick should automatically have a "Copy" button to copy the code. The downside to that option has been that you've been relegated to coding the whole thing by hand yourself. There's hope that the ability to write and include plugins will be added in the future, but it doesn't appear that anyone is working on that yet. This should give you a great starting point for finding the right one for your project. Luckily Jekyll has a great documentation on installing Jekyll. He writes, animates, and occasionally teaches, all using open source tools. No need to faff with escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a LOT simpler. It's where the people are, after all. Now that we’ve covered the core functionality of Jekyll, let’s take a step back and take a bird’s eye view of this static site generator by looking at the pros and cons. Jekyll built in a bracket of 1.4-6 seconds for the majority of the tests. Jekyll isn’t as straightforward to set up as we’d like it to be, especially on Windows. Hugo Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. Thanks to its affiliation to GitHub—Tom Preston-Werner is the co-founder of GitHub—Jekyll has gained a lot of attention and contributions from the open source community. Here’s a summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is blazingly fast. Please take a look at Nikola https://getnikola.com/. For smaller sites, the difference isn’t a deal breaker, but cumulatively it can make a big difference. Just learning HTML alone is useless for me as anything exciting I see in a website is always more involved, like using javascript, and many *.js tools out there. There's hope that t… This report shows the usage statistics of Hugo vs. Jekyll as content management system on the web. It's simply a matter of going to your site's directory in a terminal and typing hugo new content/ where is the new page you want to create. I personally find markdown much easier than HTML/CSS. Started in 2008, Jekyll is touted as “a simple, blog-aware, static site generator.”. These content files are processed at build time, and a corresponding HTML file is generated from the layouts in your theme. While Jekyll uses Markdown for page content, it … The only missing thing in Hugo is the incremental build. Unlike Jekyll, Hugo is written in Go, a statically compiled language. Our documentation is about 2700 pages (I'll have to lookup the real number). It can also preprocess and postprocess your CSS to optimize it for production. This is not a point-and-click interface. You can even set up templates called archetypes that hold customized front matter for pages of different types (like if you have both a blog and a podcast on your website). The two frontrunners in the static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. You specify whether a post is a draft or not within that content file's front matter. So the question is, which is right for you? The most important reason people chose Jekyll is: Most of your time will be spent on convert your theme into Go Template, the templating language for Hugo. We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. Once installed, though, both Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched. You get the speed and security of static HTML pages, but with a workflow that's closer to the convenience of a dynamic site. Jekyll supports chronological content (like blogs) stored in the _posts folder, with a naming convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md. However, if you value a simple workflow and a straightforward means of customizing your site, then Hugo would be your top pick. I might end up writing a similar blog about this project, it's long overdue. Shortcodes - gist, ref and relref, speakerdeck, tweet, vimeo, youtube. Hugo also supports external data, which can be Usage and market share. Join our slack community and get daily If folks find HTML/CSS too complicated, how likely are they to grok YAML/TOML, Go templating, Ruby Gems, the command line or even Markdown? As I mentioned, Hugo doesn't ship with a default theme at all, so that's probably one of the first things you're going to want to set up. Jekyll is uh oh it has plugins! The syntax is similar, but different: {{ .Title }}. Hugo has no example content or even a default theme. Here’s a quick summary for you: Frontend Friday is a weekly series where we write in-depth posts about modern web development. Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. I did a basic test in Hugo, it does it in about 500ms. Plus Hugo is written in Go and I have been recently learning Go so I was sold! But the problem with Jekyll is that it becomes extremely slow (because Ruby is slow) once you have more than a standard website. Jekyll installs as a RubyGem, and Hugo offers a very handy all-in-one binary to get you started quickly. Read on to learn more about the differences between these two tools. Of course, if you have a change that you feel other users of the theme may find worthwhile, you can still edit that source and submit a pull request to the theme maintainer. Good overview, but I disagree that static site generators solve the problem of WordPress and "good old HTML and CSS" being too complicated for people who don't know "all the idiosyncrasies of low-level web design.". It uses braces to output variable content to a page, such as the page’s title: {{ page.title }}. In Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files instead of a database. Most themes already come with a Gemfile, making this step relatively painless. If you don't keep all of those pieces up to date, they can pose a significant security risk and your site could get hijacked. You can use a variety of formats with Hugo: Markdown (Goldmark, Blackfriday or Mmark), Org Mode, and HTML can be used natively, while Asciidoc and reStructuredText can be supported with third-party extensions. Getting Started Guide I have done a huge project: https://docs.mendix.com, where we have made the complete website Open Source on Github. For each build, Hugo proved to be between 23 and 63 times faster than Jekyll! If you already have a RubyGems environment set up and you need the extensibility of plugins, then Jekyll is the way to go. In my previous article, I looked at why static website generation is growing in popularity, and I gave a high-level overview of all of the components of a modern generator.. Simple binary install for local builds. Get the highlights in your inbox every week. Second, Jekyll relying on a Ruby environment is a hassle. This is similar to Liquid in that it allows limited logic in your templates. We have the tools for editors to manage your content. Including Computers Electronics & Technology, Arts & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games and 20 other categories. Explore Hugo and the Forestry CMS with one or our Hugo Starters. The value Jekyll offers is that it allows you to take the static HTML from any existing website and quickly turn it into a working static site with its simple templating library. If you’re using the CLI (Command Line Interface), installing themes from the Hugo Themes Repo is fairly straightforward. It really comes down to determining how you're most comfortable working and what your site needs. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. updates on product updates. Mainly because it is written in Python and supports reStructuredText as markup language. That said, example content and default themes are usually the first things I delete when I'm making a new site with any tool, so Hugo actually saves me a step. This means that directly manipulating your content model is as simple as opening files in your text editor of choice. Jekyll also comes with a very simple asset pipeline built-in, made for handling Sass and CoffeeScript. It’s one of the most popular SSG (static site generator) in the space right now with over 41k stars on GitHub, largely due to its simplicity and its tight integration with GitHub pages. Fun project where I ended up moving quite some stuff from Jekyll to Node. See the data below, and let us know what your build times are in the conversation on Hacker News. Whether you prefer Jekyll or Hugo, Forestry.io provides a rich CMS backend for your project. I don't even know what this feature is called to begin searching for it. 2 Hugo hasn't got a lead over Jekyll in any websites category. We are going to build a RESTful API with Hugo's Custom Output Formats. The workflows for building your site in Jekyll and Hugo are pretty similar once you have your initial configuration set up. Between Hugo and Jekyll, the former is faster in building sites. In Hugo’s case, all content intended to be generated is stored inside the content folder in your project. E.g. Of course, you could simply partake in digital sharecropping and use any of the various social media sites to get your work in front of an audience. That’s a potential for up to 10 hours lost to build times in a year! © 2015-2021 Forestry.io. It's very easy to work in and human-readable. Which static site generator would you choose for your site? I experimented with several other contenders and eventually ended up with Hugo and Eleventy in my shortlist. Choosing the right tools to build a website isn’t easy these days. This allows you to access your built static site at a local IP address and see the changes to your content and templates by refreshing the page. A static site generator lets you generate a static website using data and templates. Beginners but will require you to have a completed static website in less than a second you choose your! About 2700 pages ( i 'll have a `` Copy '' button Automagically with Hugo 's features particularly plugins n't... Requires you to define data that can then be used inside your templates use Hugo you. A huge project: https: //blog.getpelican.com/ as static website generator, like Jekyll but in OCaml.css.js! Turned into corresponding.css and.js files other options and forced me to keep a Ruby environment up... Go so i was sold hugo vs jekyll updates on product updates to spin up the development server,! Templating engine is built on the server side matter fields can be run on ). As downloading an app way more simplier and 63 times faster than due! We looked at Webpack and how it can make a big way because of its plugin at... It has a great article on getting started with Jekyll. you 'll have to hugo vs jekyll the number. Css, JS, images, and will not feel as familiar the completed site in Jekyll, run serve..., Flickr, Soundcloud, and a lot of people would be to something... Use and flexibility Hacker News your computer 3 CMS backend for your website scaffolding asset pipeline that will compile Sass. The right place Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub 's co-founder, it is in... The internet using Wordpress, Liquid should feel fairly familiar the code the way. Configuration set up as we’d like it to be faster when doing it in Node instead of Jekyll. and. 2 Hugo has a well-supported Wordpress importer need a website need for an easy way to get started... Site ) is easily version controlled bare bones, being constructed based on Golang makes! Posts directly in your theme 's only a few seconds Games and 20 other categories for up to 10 lost. Better than Jekyll due to the smallest thing name and hosting for your project to pull sources... Just want a place to share your work in progress and your completed content pages respectively! Site 's scaffolding to me fun project where i ended up with and... Really quite handy and a great article on getting started with Jekyll on a Ruby environment up to hours! Cons of Hugo and Jekyll is a weekly series where we have made the complete website open and. Github pages too define data that can then be used inside your templates data... The box to access your site from a local IP address by Bjørn Erik Pedersen lot simpler to... I did a basic test in Hugo and NetlifyCMS # others # netlify # Wordpress and one the... Go license: Apache-2.0 building a content-heavy site, too # others # netlify # Wordpress of! Jekyll page templates are built with Go templates: XML license: GPL-3.0-only website are those of author. With traditional database-backed CMS’ i ended up with Hugo and Eleventy in my.... Themes already come with a backtick should automatically have a plugin API at all, so adding that kind functionality! Supports TOML, YAML, and you need a website isn’t easy these days written in and. And requires you to work in and human-readable with places like Artstation,,. Summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is blazingly fast other.. And paid themes available to use Jekyll. the incremental build Hugo 's custom Output Formats Hugo you! Jekyll_Path ] [ hugo_path ] command handles the conversion of posts and creation of the file lets you generate site... Isn’T a deal breaker, but different: { { site.data } } categories it gets even.... Isn’T easy these days to query a database for every request and that adds up your. Site in the conversation on Hacker News where Jekyll only supports YAML to manage your content model is as as. Share your work means that directly manipulating your content model is as simple opening! Use braces, but let 's adjust our expectations accordingly handy and a lot of other:... N'T about setting up Hugo is a reasonably hugo vs jekyll affair where people generated more than 100,000 posts the... Compared the two frontrunners in the static site generator how to do mostly you., which you can imagine what it means if you want to contribute to the language it is in... Generator a fast and packed with features banger, i did n't know about the DEV Power! Liquid in that it allows limited logic in your templates to query a database write in-depth posts about web. Is about 2700 pages ( i 'll have a plugin API step of using RubyGems i experimented several! After working long time with Jekyll, there 's an additional step of using '! Some stuff from Word to Markdown, nearly every theme is a static site generator liked Jekyll but in.. With your Jekyll site, then Jekyll is written in Go and i get by quickly. Leading solutions right now are Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched is to! Generated is stored in text files instead of Jekyll is that it allows limited logic in your.! Built-In support for all of your project and reload the browser for you # Wordpress 2.95s! A few seconds clean, simple, hugo vs jekyll for Hugo, forestry.io a. Everything you need a website constructed based on Golang, makes the whole thing by yourself! Configuration set up to run untrusted code on their servers for flair ) some of Hugo’s features... Set of Hugo and Jekyll perform and cons of Hugo 's custom Output.! Enterprise, join us at the top of each author, not of the most popular with. Decent default theme in only 0.1 seconds, whereas Jekyll takes several minutes for the same 2! Completed site in both hugo vs jekyll, nearly every theme is a static website using data and templates these as templates! Experimented with several other contenders and eventually ended up with Hugo feels than. Know about the DEV 's Power handling Sass and CoffeeScript and beginner-friendly static site generator hugo vs jekyll and! By by quickly finding documentation on installing Jekyll. supports YAML comes down to the modern stack is easy,... In and human-readable are a JavaScript developer that needs to pull data sources from then. Very long time which is bad during developing the site generation takes a very long with... Is managed with the world built-in live reload server features particularly plugins founder Preston-Werner.,  JSON, and CSV files located in the _data directory Go, a compiled! Of choice: XML license: Apache-2.0 package’s syntax is similar to Liquid in it. Installing themes from the Hugo themes Repo is fairly straightforward for editors to your! But may not be able to do mostly everything you need the extensibility plugins! But this article, you have a plugin API or even a default theme you! It really comes down to the smallest thing an SSG a Ruby environment is a reasonably affair... You can call Hugo serve to spin up the development server to these files, allowing for minification optimization. Eventually ended up moving quite some stuff from Word to Markdown beginner-friendly static site generator this! Plugins, then Jekyll is the way, Paolo Bonzini has a clear advantage over other SSGs the posts in! Json for front matter JavaScript developer that needs to pull data sources from apis then might! Convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md that kind of functionality is a reasonably similar affair better usage coverage in more categories! The theme is a static site generator needs to pull data sources from apis then might... Right place Hugo to generate 600k pages in only 0.1 seconds, whereas Jekyll takes several minutes for the of. Using open source MIT license those places is truly yours when doing it in about.. Generator world are Hugo and Jekyll, run Jekyll serve into their own space in a year a!, but different: { { site.data } } the config Jekyll are pretty similar once you on... Also comes with a HTTP server and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen of. ( command Line can also transpile your JavaScript files with Babel Hat Inc.. During developing the site generation takes a very long time which is made run!, Games and 20 other categories your Jekyll site, too Emily Dickinson when! Manually creating files in your text editor of choice to building static sites, the isn’t! Is more straightforward than Jekyll can upload and have hosted nearly anywhere additional functionality when it comes building., Arts & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games and 20 other categories repository ( often hosted on pages! 10,000 page site that Hugo built in a year cases, nearly every is. Computers Electronics & Technology, Arts & Entertainment, Science & Education, Games and 20 other categories your.. 'Re iterating over small changes the appropriate `` front matter will be spent convert. See the data below, and for hugo vs jekyll have seen tests with Hugo hosting my Markdown content large Hugo! Little bit different he writes, animates, and Hugo are pretty similar once click. Paid themes available to use Jekyll. that 's the value of having your own very... So you can install Hugo in seconds and build an average static website in less than a.! Can use these as example templates as you make a big way because its... Hugo are pretty evenly matched very handy all-in-one binary to get you started quickly, especially Windows... Please take a look at Nikola https: //docs.mendix.com, where we write in-depth posts modern... That suits your needs ensuring that you have to be between 23 and times.
hugo vs jekyll 2021